Quality Improvement (International)
Hospital nurse‐staffing models and patient‐ and staff‐related outcomes The purpose of this review, published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, was to explore the effect of hospital nurse-staffing models on patient and staff-related outcomes in the hospital setting, specifically to identify which staffing models are associated with better outcomes for patients and better staff-related outcomes, and the impact of staffing models on cost outcomes.
Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence Audit and feedback (A&F) is a common quality improvement strategy with highly variable effects on patient care. It is unclear how A&F effectiveness can be maximised. Since the core mechanism of action of A&F depends on drawing attention to a discrepancy between actual and desired performance, this study, published in Implementation Science, aimed to understand current and best practices in the choice of performance comparator.
Post-incident review after restraint in mental health care - a potential for knowledge development, recovery promotion and restraint prevention. A scoping review Use of physical restraint is a common practice in mental healthcare, but is controversial due to risk of physical and psychological harm to patients and creating ethical dilemmas for care providers. Post-incident review (PIR), that involve patient and care providers after restraints, have been deployed to prevent harm and to reduce restraint use. The aim of this scoping review, published in BMC Health Services Research, was to explore the current knowledge of PIR and to assess to what extent PIR can minimize restraint-related use and harm, support care providers in handling professional and ethical dilemmas, and improve the quality of care in mental healthcare.
Patient experience feedback in UK hospitals: what types are available and what are their potential roles in quality improvement (QI)? The comparative uses of different types of patient experience (PE) feedback as data within quality improvement (QI) are poorly understood. This paper, published in Health Expectations, reviews what types are currently available and categorizes them by their characteristics in order to better understand their roles in QI.
|